understand that the so-called "manifesto in defense of fundamental rights on the Internet" has been signed with the best will, by most Internet users, and is steeped in principles assumed (with some slight indicating a certain fondness in Section 4 and 5 among others), but I think within my freedom of expression, insufficient. It brings ideas to reconcile freedom of expression and the cultural and legal reality today, not only in English if the framework of the European Union and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, constitutional by the way, also Article 10.2. Nor bring in this context, solutions.
In my opinion the biggest threat to freedom in the network control is born of our data primarily by deficiencies in our security. Therefore, to ensure our liberty the state must have tools, all legal and constitutional, to go after "bad guys" to spy on our computers, get unduly personal data and a long ecétera.
Freedom of expression online is a fundamental right that has to take into account "the production of literary, artistic, scientific and technical information" contained in article 20 of the Constitution.
also interpret that Article 18 governs the right to honor the personal and family privacy and image, being "inviolable home", would include full personal communications over the Internet and that "except in cases of flagrante delicto" "No entry or search may be made without the consent of the owner, also guaranteeing the right to privacy and limitations on information technology to ensure this, the true principle and right to protect in the XXI century for which very little is spoken and consider vital.
believe that civil liberties in the twenty-first century the Internet comes more by way of invading the privacy of our personal computer (trojans, viruses, unauthorized data gathering, etc.) that by the end of any blog, that she had no intention of this government to do, or will, as stated by the President of the Government without proper legal authorization.
is confused, perhaps deliberately, the right to freedom of navigation in the appropriation "unauthorized" "expressly denied" of copyright and we should not mix. It has nothing to do.
understand that there is a debate on the network on Twitter just now referred to it Pablo Soto said he understands that "pablomp2p @ felixlavilla Remember when it was introduced the figure of private copying because everybody was using cassettes? For that, but 2.0 "
In his view, it concedes the battle to introduce some mechanism in the Internet and interpret, for the right to private copying, that a similar system could compensate content creators. It could be, looking ahead.
With my colleagues @ luissalvador and @ davidcierco we have agreed to the citizens explaining our views.
Culture XXI century will offer, using all the technological resources and of course Internet music, movies, television series, books, art and reproduction, etc., and integrates all technologies necessary to reach as many citizens.
This will happen when you implement new business models will lower costs and bring benefits to all, but now needs to manage the transition from cultural model of the twentieth century and the twenty-first century culture in which the future model.
Nor can neither forget nor stop to comply with international treaties to which forces, too, our Constitution, specifically Article Article 10.2dice:
" The rules relating to fundamental rights and freedoms that the Constitution shall be construed in accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human rights and international treaties and agreements thereon ratified by Spain. "
And the Universal Declaration of Human Rights stated in Article 27 that:
"1. Everyone has the right to participate freely in cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and in the scientific process and the benefits resulting therefrom.
2. Everyone is entitled to the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which is the author. "
We must therefore harmonize these two rights. Yes away from that as the PP rate in Europe and in Spain something says otherwise, but when it has handled intellectual property laws have been largely supported, at least in the arguments it now makes. Can
rule Spain as a leader Rajoy Zapatero says he will not close your blog when it is still recent Amendment 172 in the Senate, dated June 6, 2002 to EC LSSI allowed to enter the police, without judicial authorization, to control our surfing data?
Can be presented as "champions" of freedom who were complicit in it?, Pons & Dans case. The freedoms they defend forever, not just to attack the PSOE government.
understand, however, especially youth, have been interpreted as "home" his own personal computer and it is natural to bring to the forefront in defending these rights
Our job now is to give content, modifying the proposed draft Economy Act Sustainable in the section on the protection of intellectual property to adjust to the words of the Prime Minister:
defended and defend freedom of expression and security to surf the net and has reiterated the Prime Minister: "No nothing is going to close on the Net No website or any blog. "Freedom of speech prevails, but that does not make us, or may allow the company to hide against a pending issue before us, which is the protection of intellectual property." "If not, we'll no intellectual creation." "If it is understood that there is any possibility of closing some of the spaces on the Net, I say not under any circumstances "
As some people have asked me if I subscribe to the so-called" manifesto in defense of fundamental rights on the Internet, say that I think are much more full of articles 18 and 20 of the Constitution because in that show it leaves out a fundamental principle as the right to privacy threatened by the lack of security on our computers or using techniques to gather.
The danger to our fundamental rights in the Internet is more in advance in the protection to privacy in the (allow me the expression) "kidding" Zapatero Rajoy that you close your web that the leader of the opposition we have.
For our part we have to work and fulfill the words of the President to reconcile freedom of expression on the Internet and intellectual property protection. From this page
tod @ s invite Internet users, creators, to all citizens, if they have constructive ideas to reconcile this "transition" to the twenty-first century culture, improving the current Bill, the will reach the government and, of course, our Socialist parliamentary group, do not forget that we now have as a companion to one's senator Organizing Secretary of the PSOE, Leire Pajin and I know it is sensitive to this issue and this debate.
My email:
felix.lavilla @ senado.es
MI MANIFESTO FOR THE DEFENSE OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS IN SPANISH INTERNET
(Advancement)
Article 18.
1. The right to honor, personal and family privacy and image.
2. The home is inviolable. No entry or search may take place without consent or court order, except in cases of flagrante delicto.
3. We guarantee the secrecy of communications and particularly regarding postal, telegraphic and telephonic communications, except judicial resolution.
4. The Law limits the use of information technology to ensure the honor and personal and family privacy of citizens and the full exercise of their rights.
Article 20.
1. Are recognized and protected rights: a.
A freely express and disseminate thoughts, ideas and opinions through words, writing or any other means of reproduction. B.
A production and literary, artistic, scientific and technical. C.
The academic freedom. D.
A freely communicate or receive truthful information by any media. The law shall regulate the right to clause of conscience and professional secrecy in the exercise of these freedoms.
2. The exercise of these rights can not be restricted by any form of censorship.
3. The law shall regulate the organization and parliamentary control of the media controlled by the State or any public entity and shall guarantee access to the media of the significant social and political groups, respecting the pluralism of society and the various languages Spain.
4. These freedoms are limited by respect for the rights recognized in this Part, the provisions of the laws that develop and, especially, the right to honor, to privacy, to self-image and the protection of youth and childhood.
5. You can only remember the seizure of publications, recordings and other media in a court order.
0 comments:
Post a Comment