was right at the end : the PP could not be trusted on defense Internet freedoms.
The "outing" which was prepared well in advance and care (by the PP) to receive some of the signatories to the manifesto of freedom on the Internet "- without most of those who attended were responsibility as they were in good faith and with a noble interest is to defend their views - had a clear political purpose of the "organizers" of receiving such a "field trip" to attack the government of Zapatero.
Yes I was surprised by the deafening silence even almost complicity on the part of some, to the apparent contradiction of what Pons and those who were there they had what they had to vote in European Parliament (do not forget to have a majority).
already warned on November 5, 2009 warning that the Cortes Generales Official Gazette No. 66 Senate No which examined the amendments to the famous law (Law of Services of Information Society) "LSSI" (later to cover would add (EC) via group amendment Popular wanted to get "a bag" to a sign, without a warrant, in our personal computers.
I anticipated it was not credible position Esteban González Pons ( author of the amendment a) and Enrique Dans (as demonstrated without response to the above amendment dated June 6, 2002), with the attacks that launched the Government especially Pons. It was not credible. I said and I posted .
one question correct, educated, adjusted to what I thought could happen in a game that really had attacked the liberties on the Internet as the PP, caused, first a attempt to justify itself Dans sending my blog, my answer and later a full article of Enrique Dans, I did not answer, as anticipated, since my initial article and the answer I gave was unnecessary publications.
So I said, well I posted , and so I keep it.
Now it is the Enrique Dans, in an attitude that now, to his credit, who is disappointed by the publication of an article by José Maria Lassalle, National Secretary of Culture and MP for the Partido Popular, in The Country Today, entitled "More freedom, ownership and legality."
But I wonder if it was Esteban Gonzalez Pons, on behalf of the PP, which is expected to lay the "threads" to organize the meeting in the PP with the signatories of the "manifesto for freedom on the Internet", now what do you say? What do you think?, What he painted? ... in that reception (by the way in the 2.0 era would be newsworthy photos of that meeting)
In view of the facts I stand by that he was required to alert, citizens who want to read it, of these specific antecedents of PP in its intention to attack really frustrated Internet freedoms in the amendment signed by Esteban Gonzalez Pons on February 6, 2002 , and I did in my article dated December 5 . With this background, could Pons to be the captain of freedom on the Internet?. I can not believe it and I questioned directly or indirectly those who cheered him.
Everyone can judge the facts once they are published documents.
0 comments:
Post a Comment