So I am biting my fingernails to the 'height of a building of the Esplanade. It is a two storey building with ashlar ground floor, with their respective viewpoints, which is being added four new heights, with the last of them 
retranqueda to indoors. I fully understand that we should try to capitalize on a building, and it is better to topple it. But at this point where it enters the "architect like, which should be subject to some" commission taste, to dismiss certain projects.
retranqueda to indoors. I fully understand that we should try to capitalize on a building, and it is better to topple it. But at this point where it enters the "architect like, which should be subject to some" commission taste, to dismiss certain projects. This last assertion is the title of this short article. 'm waiting to see what they do in the new heights . From the vantage point (if they are viewpoints) of the new plants are larger than the original. I think the most sensible is that the external image is as the first two floors, and do not go as in the military government (which speaks in its day), where, apart from changing the balustrade by straight lines, stone slabs were used instead of paint it's like is the original.
The second of the photos belongs to a building sewer (the first quarter of last century), photographed last year and that speaks for itself. Hopefully this will never happen here. Although if I had to bet I would not.
Extrapolating this to the coastline of Alicante could "get to talk " for a very long time since Much has changed in 100 years, and more in this last week with the golden jubilee of the Esplanade of Spain and the exposure of the Fish Market of " Alicante in Black and White," but that is not the purpose of these lines.
Finally I continue with business as usual ..... Does that building belongs?
Greetings!
